Colorin Colorado: Helping children read... and succeed!
A bilingual site for families and educators of English language learners
  • small text
  • medium text
  • large text
  • print

Migrant Students: What We Need to Know to Help Them Succeed

By: Giselle Lundy-Ponce (2010)

It was almost twenty years ago that I had my first encounter with migrant students and the world of migrant education. I had just graduated from college and got a job with The Close Up Foundation, a non-profit organization that promoted civic involvement and the study of democracy. The foundation provided a civics and social studies curriculum and materials for middle- and high school teachers to implement in their classes throughout the year. My particular program was targeted to English language learners (ELLs) who were immigrant and/or migrant students.

Through this job, I worked with ESL/ESOL teachers of migrant students and administrators of the Migrant Education Program (MEP)1 all over the country. I found them to be tireless advocates and passionate in their efforts to teach and serve their students, and learned immensely about migrant families and the educators who work with them. I hope some of those lessons shared in this article will provide a helpful context for educators who work with this unique population of students. These experiences opened my eyes to a reality I was unaware of, and inspired my subsequent work in education throughout all these years.

The historical background, issues, context, and data about migrant students are all too numerous and complex to explore in depth in this article. What follows is a snapshot of current demographics, academic achievement data, a discussion of some of the other challenges these students confront as well as promising programs, and some recommendations for educators with migrant students in their classrooms to help them succeed. Additionally, at the end of the article, there is a listing of recommended resources for further information.

Who Are Migrant Children?

Migrant children2 served by the MEP are children and youth ages 0-213 whose families work in the agricultural and/or fisheries industries and who will often move across districts and state lines several times within a 12-36 month period of time, following the various crops by season. It is not unusual for children to also work in the fields, alongside their families, when they're not in school and even during the school year.

How many?

The most recent data from the U.S. Department of Education (for the 2007-08 school year) shows that in 49 states, the MEP served a total of 485,340 students in preschool through 12th grade during the regular school year and an additional 164,667 during the summer.

Where are they?

Every state, including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, has migrant students. California, Texas, Florida, Washington, and Oregon serve the most migrant students, with California serving close to 34 percent of the nationwide total (CDE, 2007).

What is their background?

Nationwide, it is estimated that 90 percent of migrant children are of Latino origin, and that 34 percent are ELLs.

Challenges for migrant families

Sixteen years ago, the National Commission on Migrant Education (NCME) released its breakthrough report on the condition of education for school-age migrant children and youth. While there have been improvements, many of the Commission's startling findings still ring true today. At the time the NCME released its report, its findings included the following risk factors (Martinez et al, 1994):

  • Physical hazards

    Migrant farmworkers have one of the most labor-intensive, physically-demanding, often hazardous yet grossly undercompensated occupations in the country

  • Isolation

    Migrant families tend to live in isolation from the communities where they work

  • Family separation

    It is not uncommon for parents and children to be separated if parents want the children to finish the school year in the same school while they move on to the next work site

  • Socioeconomic disadvantages

    Migrant children experience more acute poverty, health problems, health hazards, social alienation, educational disadvantages, mobility and lack of educational opportunities than any other major school population segment

  • Educational background

    Migrant parents have the lowest levels of educational attainment of any occupational group

  • Language

    Large numbers of migrant students lack English language proficiency (even though most are U.S. citizens) and/or require remedial instruction

  • Graduation rates

    Migrant children have one of the highest dropout rates in the nation

  • Program support

    Federally-funded programs for migrant children are not sufficiently funded to meet the children's needs

Many migrant farmworkers in Florida will only earn $2.50 per large bucket of peanuts, and they can expect to fill some 10 buckets per person after a long 10-12 hour day.

Poverty, low wages, deplorable and unsafe living/working conditions, interrupted schooling, lack of social mobility and lack of educational opportunities still plague migrant families. Migrant farmworkers still toil long hours in the fields and most live well below the poverty level (Education Week, 2009; LaCroix, 2007; Franquiz et al, 2004).

There are generally no health insurance benefits, paid leave, pensions, workers' compensation benefits, overtime pay, life insurance or other benefits for migrant workers and their families (Branz-Spall et al, 2003).

Back to Top

Barriers to Achievement

Given these challenges, it is not surprising that most migrant students face multiple barriers to academic achievement, high school completion, and post-secondary attainment. Researchers, experts and advocates (NCBE, 2001; Kindler, 2002; Branz-Spall et al, 2003; Fránquiz & Salinas, 2004; LaCroix, 2007; USDE, 2006; NCES, 2010) have identified some of the following factors as key challenges jeopardizing migrant students' chances to excel academically and later in life:

These include a lack of:

  • Access to fully-qualified or adequately prepared teachers and staff
  • Enrollment in rigorous, college preparatory coursework
  • Participation in challenging grade-level content coursework if students are ELLs
  • Resources for unmet instructional needs
  • Knowledge about and access to information on higher education or post-secondary vocational options

Other challenges include:

  • Disproportionate attendance at high-needs schools with high concentrations of children who are poor and/or who are ELLs
  • Large gaps in missed instructional and assessment time
  • Missed time and lack of continuity while adjusting to different academic standards, curriculum, expectations, instructional programs, and school environments every time they move
  • Being overage in many cases, yet not being able to perform at grade level due to interrupted schooling, late-entry into the country, lack of exposure to high-quality early childhood education prior to Kindergarten
  • Difficulty keeping track of high school credits earned for graduation if students attend multiple schools in different states

Graduation rates

One of the most pernicious results of all these impediments is the unacceptably large number of students who drop out. Most of these students will not continue their education, which means they will remain in poverty and marginalized from the communities in which they live. While it is challenging to determine an exact nationwide dropout rate due to inconsistent record-keeping and tracking, different state formulas for calculating dropouts, and other data gathering challenges in trying to follow cohorts of students, all nationwide estimates for the migrant high school dropout rate are exceptionally high.

Some range between 45 and 65 percent for high school (NCES, 2001) to 87 percent for all school-aged migrant children, according to the 2002-2003 National Agricultural Workers Survey (NCES, 2010). Recent individual state data on migrant dropouts reveal equally alarming numbers. In California, the state with the highest number of migrant students, the dropout rate is estimated to be above 50 percent (CDE, 2007; USDE, 2006).

Current estimates for the high school graduation rate of migrant students nationwide are equally difficult to establish. One research review found that the graduation rate was between 10 and 20 percent (Lunon, 1986).

Academic achievement

On state assessments of reading and math, migrant students score well below their mainstream peers. Indeed, as Table 1 shows, in the five states with the highest migrant student enrollments, the percentage of 8th grade migrant students scoring at the proficient or above level is less than 50 percent in most cases. For those students who do not score at the proficient or above level, there is often a gap of 25 percentage points or higher.

TABLE 1: Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Above on 2005-06 State Math and English Language Arts (ELA) Assessments

  Migrant Students All Students Low-Income Students
8th Grade ELA
California
18.4
42
25.9
Texas
67
83
75
Florida
19.5
46.9
31.8
Washington
48.7
69.3
57.3
Oregon
29.6
65.6
49.7
8th Grade MATH
California
20.5
35.2
22.6
Texas
53
68
58
Florida
37.6
60.2
45.8
Washington
20.2
48.2
31.3
Oregon
38.6
65.5
50.3

SOURCE: USDE (2006)

Age and grade gaps

It is not uncommon for migrant students to be at least one year older than their peers, and be at least half a year behind — this is especially true for those migrant students who are also ELLs. It is common knowledge that as students fall behind more and more, they give up the struggle to catch up and end up leaving school before they even reach the 11th or 12th grades.

Upheaval and disruption

In addition to the barriers to educational achievement outlined above, many migrant children are subjected to the harmful disruptions of:

  • Moving in the middle of a school year
  • Navigating a new school system and environment multiple times in a school year
  • Not having an adequate living space to focus on their studies
  • Being physically far away from the resources of the school and the community afterhours and on weekends
  • Being separated from family members, teachers, and friends they have gotten to know and trust when they have to move
  • Being exposed to numerous hazards when they are working in the fields (lack of safety equipment and gear, pesticides, insecticides, heavy equipment and machinery, toxic fumes, insects, inclement weather, etc.)

Back to Top

Promising Programs

Despite the myriad difficulties that besiege migrant children and their families, scores of them have been successful and have overcome the odds thanks to the joint and coordinated efforts of targeted programs. Their resiliency also comes as a result of their own efforts, as well as the support and encouragement from family, schools, teachers, administrators, community organizers, advocates, foundations, etc. who have instilled in these students the belief that they can rise above their circumstances.

In addition to the Migrant Education Program, these other federally funded programs set up around the country to address the needs of migrant students have the widest reach:

  • The High School Equivalency Program (HEP) was established in 1967. HEP works with students who have dropped out of school to get them to acquire their general education diploma or GED. It reaches more than 7,000 students every year.
  • The College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP) was established in 1972. CAMP works with students in their first year of college and helps them with academics, personal issues, and offers financial assistance. Approximately 2,400 migrant students participate annually. Close to 75 percent of all CAMP students graduate with a bachelor's degree.
  • Seasonal and Migrant Head Start serves children of migrant and seasonal farm workers who meet income and other eligibility guidelines. Services are for children from six-months to five-years of age. Because of the nature of the work done by the families, the hours of services are longer and the length of program is shorter (fewer months) than traditional Head Start services. It serves close to 35,000 children in 38 states.

There are also smaller, innovative programs that have been developed with Title I Part C funding that focus at the state and district level on dropout prevention, parent involvement, and after school programs. One such program that is well-know is the state consortia-led effort Project SMART (Summer Migrants Access Resources through Technology), which offers distance learning, enriched, engaging coursework, tutoring, televised instructional shows, and videotaped instruction. It was originally piloted in Montana and Texas, but currently operates in 16 states.

Some states like Florida and Montana also have laptop loan programs for migrant students so that they can keep up with their schoolwork, have access to online coursework and/or instructional information on core academic content, and stay connected to the teachers and program staff they have had contact with in the schools where they have been enrolled.

Back to Top

Strategies for Success

What can educators do in the classroom to meet the needs of their migrant students, especially those who are ELLs? Some helpful ideas include:

Welcoming students and families

  • Creating a positive and welcoming classroom environment by modeling respect for differences, and sharing experiences and values
  • Reaching out to the families of migrant students and help them become familiarized and comfortable with the school their children currently attend
  • Creating a list of helpful social service resources and advocacy organizations that families can call on

Encouraging academic success

  • Implementing research-based methods on effective instruction for linguistically and culturally diverse student populations into classroom practice
  • Exposing students to the more academically rigorous coursework and content that mainstream students have access to
  • Holding students to high expectations
  • Using cooperative learning strategies

Increasing collaboration and professional development

  • Reaching out to mainstream colleagues to get their assistance in teaching core content to students
  • Reaching out to colleagues at the school or via social networking sites to share best practices, resources, tools, information, etc. and not feel isolated

Encouraging future educational participation

  • Making sure that families of migrant students know what to do to navigate the system better once they are ready to move on
  • Urging students to continue their schooling, keeping in mind the particularly challenging situations of each student, and making appropriate referrals to other staff and/or community-based organizations whenever possible
  • Encouraging students to establish electronic mail "pen-pal" relationships with migrant students when they leave the school so that a sense of continuity and the security of familiarity can be established

When teachers, parents, administrators, the community, and other advocates work in concert to share best practices, communicate to each other and the community at large how important and necessary it is to pay particular attention to the needs of this population, and work closely with the children toward specific outcomes, migrant students greatly benefit.

Back to Top

Policy Recommendations

As important as the previously mentioned recommendations, strategies and lessons are for our schools to try and implement, teachers, paraprofessionals, counselors, school principals and other school staff can not do it alone. To better meet the needs of our migrant students, it is critical that we call attention to their plight and urge our nation's leaders to act in the following areas:

  • Dropout prevention and continuing education

    Call for the widespread implementation and strengthening of dropout prevention programs, as well as programs that reach out to "out of school" youth-students with interrupted formal schooling or no prior formal schooling who may have never been enrolled in U.S. schools

    Call for better outreach to school dropouts to return to school or enroll in high school equivalency or GED programs

  • Social services

    Call for the provision of more 'wraparound' social services for migrant families such as health screenings, nutrition counseling, child care referrals, pre-natal care, mental health services referrals

  • Collaboration

    Call for more targeted, concerted efforts between states, community-based organizations, districts, and schools to better coordinate efforts to meet the needs of migrant students without duplicating efforts

  • Child protection

    Enact legislation or enforce laws prohibiting children from working in the fields such as the CARE Act4

  • Intervention

    Commission and fund evaluations of intervention programs that specifically target migrant students to then disseminate best practices

  • Professional development

    Advocate for stronger, more widely available professional development programs for teachers and school staff on effective instruction for migrant students who are English language learners

  • Best practices

    Continue to help resource-poor schools improve and promote school improvement strategies that work

  • Student data tracking

    Provide adequate funding for better, more accurate tracking systems

  • Early childhood education

    Fund and implement more early childhood care and education programs for migrant infants, toddlers and preschoolers

  • Adult and parent education

    Promote adult education and parent involvement programs

We must recognize and respect the important and numerous contributions of migrant families to the country's economy, culture, and diversity. An informed, active citizenry and an educated workforce are the pillars of our democracy and our economy, and so we must engage in a concerted effort to address the many and significant challenges keeping too many of our migrant students from reaching their potential. We must look forward to telling a different story twenty years from now.

Back to Top

Giselle Lundy-Ponce is an education policy and research analyst with the American Federation of Teachers.

Special thanks to Roger Rosenthal, Executive Director of the Migrant Legal Action Program, for his review of this article.

References

Click the "References" link above to hide these references.

Bibliography

Abramson. L. (2008). Laptops Help Keep Migrant Workers' Kids in School. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91891812

Academy for Educational Development. (2010). Improving the Skills and Credentials of Migrant, Seasonal and American Indian / Alaska Native Head Start Teachers: Building from Within. Retrieved from http://www.aed.org/Publications/upload/AED-Headstart-Whitepaper.pdf

Allen, G. (2009). For Migrant Students, A Chance To Watch History. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=98710783

Armario, C. (2009, October 7). For Migrant Children, Out of the Fields and Into Head Start. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2009/10/07/06migrant.h29.html?qs=migrant

Berghom, J.L. (2009) Get SMART: Summer Enrichment Program Gives Migrant Students Help with Math. The Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.brainchild.com/Pdfs/GetSMART.pdf

Branz-Spall, A.G.; Rosenthal, R.; & Wright, A. (2003). Children of the Road: Migrant Students, our nation's most mobile population. Journal of Negro Education, 72(1), 55-62.

California Department of Education. (2007). California Migrant Education Program, Comprehensive Needs Assessment: Initial Report of Findings. Sacramento, CA: CDE

Daniels Brown, M. (2001). Meeting the Educational Needs of Migrant Students. Education World. Retrieved from http://www.educationworld.com/a_curr/curr347.shtml

Fránquiz, M.E., & Salinas, C. (Eds.) (2004). Scholars in the Field, The Challenges of Migrant Education. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools

Kindler, A.L. (2002). Education of Migrant Students. Retrieved from http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2231/Migrants-Education.html

LaCroix, C. (2007). Girls and Boys, Interrupted: Working to Fill Gaps in Migrant Students' Education. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/girls-boys-interrupted

Lunon, J.K. (1986). Migrant Student Record Transfer System: What Is It and Who Uses It? ERIC Digest. Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools

Martinez, Y.G., Scott, J.Jr., Cranston-Gingras, A & Platt, J.S. (1994). National Commission on Migrant Education. (1992). Invisible Children: A Portrait of Migrant Education in the United States, A Final Report (Report No. ISSN-0-16-038063-4). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education

The President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. (2003). From Risk to Opportunity, Fulfilling the Educational Needs of Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: The White House

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Characteristics of the 100 Largest Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts in the United States: 2001-02. Washington, D.C.: NCES

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Characteristics of the 100 Largest Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts in the United States: 2003-04. Washington, D.C.: NCES

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2008a). Characteristics of the 100 Largest Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts in the United States: 2004-05, 2005-06. Washington, D.C.: NCES

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2008b). Characteristics of the 100 Largest Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts in the United States: 2005-06. Washington, D.C.: NCES

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Participation of Migrant Students in Title I Migrant Education Program (MEP) Summer-Term Projects, 1998. Washington, D.C.: NCES

U.S. Department of Education, National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education (NCBE). (2001). Why Migrant Education Matters. Washington, D.C.: NCBE

U.S. Department of Education. Office of Migrant Education. (2006). Title I, Part C, Migrant Education Program Data Tables-2002-03 thru 2005-06. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/mep/resources.html#pubs

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, Migrant Education Program Annual Report: Eligibility, Participation, Services (2001-02) and Achievement (2002-03), Washington, D.C., 2006

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service. (2004) Title I Migrant Education Program, National Trends Report: 1998-2001 (Document No. 2003-16). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics (2010). Accelerating Achievement and Ensuring Equity Fiscal year 2011 Budget Request. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget11/justifications/b-aaee.pdf

U.S. Department of Education (2010). Category I Child Counts for SY 2007-2008. (unpublished table acquired from Moreno, M. at USDE OME)

Martinez, Y. G., Scott, J., Cranston-Gingras, A., & Platt, J. S. (1994). Voices From The Field: Interviews With Students From Migrant Farmworker Families. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, (14), 333-348

Sanchez, C. (2009). Hard Times Even Harder For Migrant Laborers. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121274651

Zehr, M.A. (2007, May 16). Migrant Education Program Draws Scrutiny. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/05/16/37migrant.h26.html?qs=migrant

Endnotes

Endnotes

Click the "Endnotes" link above to hide these endnotes.

1The Migrant Education Program was established in 1966, as Part C of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), to serve the unique needs of migrant students. Title I, Part C covers costs that are usually not covered by general Title I grants to school districts. MEP funds can be used for intervention reading and math programs, social support services, health and nutrition services, transportation, and other needed supplemental services. The complete description of Title I, Part C of ESEA can be found at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg8.html

2For an official definition of "migratory child", please refer to ESEA's Title I, Part C, Section 1309 found at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg8.html#sec1309

3For funding purposes, however, the Migrant Education Program provides funds starting at age three

4The Children's Act for Responsible Employment (CARE Act of 2007). On June 12, 2007, Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA) introduced the CARE Act (H.R. 2674). The CARE Act addresses the inequities and harsh conditions faced by the estimated 500,000 children currently employed in agriculture in the U.S. The bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) by bringing the age and work hours standards for children working in agriculture up to the standards set under FLSA for all other forms of child labor.

Comments and Recommendations

Excellent article! Thank you SO MUCH for sharing this. I very much appreciate the migrant workers that arrive in our area every spring and wish I could do more to encourage their children. Will pass this one for sure!
Posted by: MommyMaestra  |  March 05, 2012 05:13 PM
Thank you, thank you. I have worked with the Migrant program for more than 25 years. I love the passion for people that one must possess to work with other educators and families to promote the success for children. Roger Rosenthal is one of the people who continues to work with passion and endurance for our Migrant children.
Posted by: Elaine Fox  |  March 27, 2012 11:30 AM
(Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.)

Post a new comment

 

 

Would you like ideas on this topic from other educators? Join the conversation about ELLs on our free social network on Ning, the Colorín Colorado Community!